Choosing the best Hyperliquid RPC node is a crucial operational decision, not a buzzword chase. Builders need predictable latency, transparent rate limits, production-ready failover, and actionable observability to keep bots, trading tools, and analytics writing and reading reliably. In this explainer, we’ve shortlisted the seven best RPC providers and analyzed how to evaluate them so your Hyperliquid workflow moves from test to production with minimal friction.
What is Hyperliquid?
Hyperliquid is a Layer-1 built for real-time trading. It has two parts: HyperCore (the on-chain order book where trading is gasless) and HyperEVM (an embedded EVM layer where gas is paid in HYPE).
In other words, it delivers a CEX-like trading experience in a trustless environment. Apps hit the engine via RPC calls, so reliable RPC is critical: HyperCore trades pay no gas (only trading fees), while HyperEVM contracts do consume HYPE gas.
What to Look For in a Hyperliquid RPC Node Provider
Not all RPC services are equal. When selecting an RPC provider for Hyperliquid, consider the following:
Latency consistency (p50/p95), low jitter, and region proximity to your users/bots.
Clear endpoint classes (public/private), auth model, and explicit rate limits.
Sustainable throughput (RPS/QPS), sensible burst handling, and backoff guidance.
Managed failover (active–active/active–passive), health checks, and routing dampening.
Actionable observability: logs, traces, per-key metrics, and transparent incident comms.
Enterprise readiness: documented SLOs/SLAs, maintenance windows, security posture, and roadmap.
Scaling path: plans that grow from dev to production without client rewrites.
1. HypeRPC (Imperator)
HypeRPC is a reliable RPC provider. Builder-centric onboarding, clear endpoints, and practical docs aligned to Hyperliquid’s read/write workflows make the path from test to production fast and predictable. Here are some more key qualities of HypeRPC:
Native to Hyperliquid, aligned with the validator set
Validator-backed by Imperator, one of the largest multi-chain operators
99.99% uptime, enterprise-grade security, ultra-low latency
WebSocket support for real-time trading and infra reliability
EU for cost-efficient workloads and JP for the closest path to the validator set, ideal for real-time bots, dashboards, and perps infra
Dual-binary architecture with hlnode and nanoreth
Start with HypeRPC as your baseline for low-friction shipping, then compare other RPC providers against your region, latency targets, and growth plan.
2. QuickNode
A multichain RPC provider with a single console, quick provisioning, and unified billing that makes adding a Hyperliquid endpoint simple for teams already on the platform.
QuickNode provides comprehensive support for HyperEVM (the EVM layer of Hyperliquid).
Spin up a Hyperliquid endpoint in minutes via a straightforward UI.
Usage stats and alerting help you watch rate limits and errors.
Routing to nearby regions helps reduce latency for bots and trading tools.
3. Chainstack
A structured, collaboration-friendly RPC provider with projects, role-based access, and predictable environments; ideal for governance-minded teams and repeatable deployments.
Fine-grained permissions for metrics, key rotation, and endpoint management.
Steady latency profiles and high throughput for mission-critical workloads.
Logs, metrics, request tracing, and access policies like IP allowlists.
4. dRPC
A routing-flexible, multi-region RPC provider that fits builders planning active-active architectures with configurable failover policies.
Geo-distributed clusters with p95-aware steering reduce latency.
Health probes and cooldowns shift traffic during incidents while limiting oscillation.
Aggregate capacity keeps throughput steady for data-heavy workloads.
Granular rate-limit controls and configurable failover.
Logs, traces, per-region metrics; team-level access controls.
5. Lava Network
Lava provides Hyperliquid RPC via its Gateway, with posts and guides showing active access; confirm availability in your workspace before production.
To lower latency, a unified endpoint pairs your request with a top performer in-region.
Multiple backends create an implicit failover effect and reduce single-vendor risk.
Integrate once to access RPCs for Hyperliquid (and other chains).
Provider variety enables A/B testing of throughput and response profiles without code changes.
6. GetBlock
GetBlock now supports HyperEVM dedicated RPC nodes (the EVM layer of Hyperliquid). It’s pragmatic for lean teams and internal tools that need rapid access to Hyperliquid RPCs.
Minimal control panel and fast key issuance to generate a Hyperliquid endpoint in minutes.
Practical tiers for prototypes, dashboards, and batch jobs with clear rate limits.
Manage Hyperliquid alongside other networks without complex hierarchies.
Core features and basic metrics cover day-one needs; add more as you grow.
Pay-as-you-go and subscriptions make it a sensible “get moving now” choice.
7. Stakely
Stakely brings validator-style operations to RPC delivery. It appeals to teams that prefer conservative infra practices and community alignment.
Transparent maintenance notes, predictable change windows, steady execution.
Globally distributed infrastructure and disciplined monitoring for consistent latency and availability.
Validator heritage and open communication foster trust.
Start on a free load-balanced RPC for testing, upgrade to dedicated capacity as needs grow.
Choosing The Best Hyperliquid RPC Node Provider
Choosing a Hyperliquid RPC provider is about predictable performance and simple operations. Prioritise consistent latency, clear rate limits, usable observability, and a clean path from testing to production. Do your due diligence by testing in your target region, validating p95 latency and error rates, reviewing uptime history and support guarantees, and confirming a scaling plan that does not require client rewrites.
FAQs
What are the best Hyperliquid RPC node provider options?
The best options covered in this guide are HypeRPC (Imperator), QuickNode, Chainstack, dRPC, Lava Network, GetBlock (HyperEVM), and Stakely.
Do I need multiple RPC provider options for Hyperliquid?
Start with one. Add a second for simple failover when traffic and risk grow. Keep the routing logic minimal and test it.
What should I look for when choosing a Hyperliquid RPC?
Reliable latency in your region, clear rate limits, simple failover, useful logs and metrics, transparent incident history, and a pricing path that scales without code changes.
